Cost allocation

Give cloud spend a business owner, not just a provider label

Use segments and allocation rules to connect AWS and Azure costs with teams, products, customers, environments, and cost centres.

Join the waitlist Book a demo

Permanent Free plan. No time-limited trial.

The ownership gap

Provider structure is not organizational responsibility

Accounts are not teams

Cloud accounts and subscriptions rarely match the way engineering and finance discuss ownership.

Tags are incomplete

Tags help, but shared services, inherited infrastructure, and missing metadata still leave spend unassigned.

Showback needs repeatability

A one-off spreadsheet split cannot explain how the same rule will treat the next billing period.

Rule anatomy

A rule that another reader can inspect

Keep the matching conditions and assigned business dimensions together so the allocation is explainable.

When

Provider equals AWS
Service matches the shared-platform scope
Environment tag is present

Then

Assign the platform cost segment
Associate the responsible engineering team
Expose the result in showback views

In the product

A repeatable allocation model

Segments

Define reusable scopes for teams, products, customers, environments, and cost centres.

Rule conditions

Match cost rows through provider, account, service, resource, region, tag, and other supported dimensions.

Shared-cost allocation

Apply explicit rules to distribute shared spend while preserving the rule that produced the result.

Ownership context

Associate allocated scopes with the team responsible for reviewing or acting on them.

Showback views

Report allocated cost to responsible teams without claiming that Costfluent posts chargeback entries.

Consistent downstream use

Use the same allocation in budgets, views, insights, savings, and scheduled reports.

Make ownership part of the cost data

Start free and build allocation rules around the teams and dimensions your organization already uses.